中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d030b/d030bdacc4e3419972dbd41b99675feee4011e33" alt=""
2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cc7a/9cc7ac1ab56f291cd254f3b37ed620ba1d8f1c58" alt=""
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d45ee/d45eeabe9d41ee84ac2821d136715ffb88d431fb" alt=""
台积电四处建厂现隐忧,台媒:离开体系和人才,成功模式难复制****** 【环球时报驻德国特约记者 青木 环球时报记者 王冬 陈立非 宋毅】今年下半年以来,台积电在欧美日的产能布局步入“快车道”,引发岛内愈发强烈的“掏空台芯片产业链”质疑。法国广播电台23日报道称,台积电近来被传出考虑在德国设立其欧洲首座芯片工厂。为应对美国及日本新设产能的需求,台积电已经不断外派工程师前往支持。有业者表示,台积电未来若再前往德国投资设厂,人力方面恐将更加吃紧,营运获利压力也会因此进一步升高。 员工负荷量恐“破表” 23日,日本资深国会议员关芳弘透露,台积电斥资86亿美元在日本熊本县建厂之后,正考虑在日本兴建第二座工厂,熊本厂预计明年下半年落成启用。台积电在美国的产能布局也在加快落实。台积电日前公布一项耗资400亿美元的规划,扩建和升级该公司正在凤凰城建设的美国生产中心。此次在美设厂计划共分两期:第一期预计2024年量产5纳米和4纳米芯片;第二期则是更先进的3纳米芯片,预计2026年量产。 台湾《工商时报》24日分析称,自2021年下半年以来,就多次传出台积电将前往德国设厂的消息,但距离真正投资仍有很多困难需要解决。台湾《经济日报》认为,台积电布局欧洲面临三大挑战,包括客户真实需求、基础设施资源、人力/工程师人员调度。《联合报》24日报道称,台积电赴德国设厂,未来恐将像美国建厂项目那样,面临成本高、人才招募困难和相关先进材料供应不足等艰巨考验。还有台媒直言,台积电员工的负荷量会不会“破表”也是个问题。台积电超过5万名工程师中,有约500人连同家眷到美国协助建厂。日本新厂也需要再调度500—600人。 展示“深耕台湾”决心 台积电近来频繁的海外投资,在岛内引发“掏空台湾芯片产业”的质疑。台积电总裁魏哲家近日对此表示,半导体产业用的是脑力,在大部分地区都有工程师不足的情况,并不是工厂搬到哪个地方,那个地方就会发展茂盛。 另据台湾《财讯》报道,日本自民党参议员三宅伸吾近日声称,台积电在日本生产的是落后最新制程两三个世代的技术产品,而且台积电在台湾地区以外生产的量,只占总产量的一成左右,仍有八九成留在台湾。 为展示所谓“深耕台湾”的决心,台积电将于12月29日在南科晶圆18厂举行3纳米量产暨扩厂典礼。根据台积电官网信息,台积电立足台湾在全球广设厂区,目前拥有4座12英寸超大晶圆厂、4座8英寸晶圆厂和1座6英寸晶圆厂。 成功模式难复制 通信行业资深专家项立刚对《环球时报》记者表示,台积电在日本、欧洲等地进行生产布局,实际上成本是很高的。欧洲和日本的芯片制造都已经衰落得非常厉害。台积电一个企业想改变这种经济大势,很难做得到。 岛内舆论也对台积电产能布局充满疑虑。《工商时报》22日发表社论称,长期以来台湾就有生产资源“五缺”问题,半导体产能外迁是迟早的事,但此次台积电赴美设厂完全是基于地缘政治的决策。文章称,台积电赴美建厂,生产离开台半导体生态体系和人才,很难复制过去的成功模式。 (环球时报) 仲博彩票平台地图 |